Skip to main content

Netanyahu’s Speech in Congress and the Politics of Clapping (optional)

Link to Binyamin Netanyahu speech to Congress, May 24th, 2011:


http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2011-05-24-netanyahu-israel-iran_n.htm 



Uri Friedman Uri Friedman – Tue May 24, 3:28 pm ET



Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu outlined his vision for peace with the Palestinians this afternoon in a rare address to a joint session of Congress, days after President Obama floated a peace proposal in which the borders of Israel and Palestine would be based on a modified version of the boundaries that existed before the 1967 Arab-Israeli war. Netanyahu claimed he was willing to make “painful compromises” and “give up parts of the ancestral Jewish homeland” to broker a two-state solution but once again said he considers the pre-1967 lines “indefensible” for Israel.


For the people who measure these things this way, the affection for Netanyahu in the chamber was clear: the Israeli prime minister received 29 standing ovations from Congress during his address; at President Obama’s last State of the Union he got 25. (In fact, Al Jazeera initially tweeted the speech with the hashtag #AIPAC”–the pro-Israel lobby Netanyahu addressed last night–before changing it to #US Congress. The mistake, we imagine, was inadvertent, but analysts could still have a field day with that one). Al Jazeera’s Dima Khatib, for example, writes that Netanyahu would never receive 20 standing ovations in the Israeli parliament, adding that “US congressmen are so excited about Netanyahu’s speech that they clap at almost every paragraph, like Arab parliaments do to Arab leaders!”



But aside from the politics of clapping, what exactly is in Netanyahu’s proposal? The Israeli prime minister called on Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas to accept a Jewish state and “tear up” the reconciliation deal Abbas’s Fatah faction recently signed with the Palestinian Islamist group Hamas, since, as Netanyahu put it, Hamas is bent on Israel destruction. Netanyahu demanded that any Palestinian state be demilitarized, that Israel retain areas in the Jerusalem and Tel Aviv suburbs and maintain a military presence along the Jordan river, that Jerusalem remain the undivided “capital of Israel,” and that Palestinian refugees not be permitted to return to Israel. Analysis of Netanyahu’s address is going in several different directions.
*****************************************************************************
WASHINGTON — Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel, broadly laying out the Israeli response to President Obama’s peace proposals, called on the Palestinian Authority president, Mahmoud Abbas, on Tuesday to accept what Mr. Netanyahu framed as a tenet: that Palestinians will not get a right of return to Israel. In so doing, he made clear that he was giving no ground on the major stumbling blocks to a peace agreement.




“I stood before my people and said that I will accept a Palestinian state; it’s time for President Abbas to stand up before his people and say, ‘I will accept a Jewish state,’ ” Mr. Netanyahu said to cheers from a hugely friendly crowd of Democratic and Republican lawmakers gathered in the House chamber of the Capitol.


“Those six words will change history,” Mr. Netanyahu said. “With those six words, the Israeli people will be prepared to make a far-reaching compromise. I will be prepared to make a far-reaching compromise.”
New York Times online


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Clothed with Salvation: The Garden, the Veil, Tabitha, and Christ

Daniel Belnap Studies in the Bible and Antiquity: Volume – 4, Pages: 43-69 Provo, Utah: Maxwell Institute, 2012 The views expressed in this article are the views of the author and do not necessarily represent the position of the Maxwell Institute, Brigham Young University, or The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.   Sandwiched between the account of Saul’s conversion in Acts 9 and Peter’s vision of the Gentiles in Acts 10 is the story of the raising of Tabitha. While staying in the town of Lydda, Peter, the presiding disciple of Christ, is approached by two individuals from the neighboring city of Joppa with the request that he come and attend to the then-deceased Tabitha. When he gets there, he is met by widows weeping and wailing over Tabitha’s departure. We know practically nothing of Tabitha except that she is a believer and a woman “full of good works and almsdeeds” (Acts 9:36). These works are revealed as the mourners present themselves before Peter, showing him the clo...
Post a Comment
Read more

The DNA of Abraham’s Children

Analysis of Jewish genomes refutes the Khazar claim. French Jews of the Middle Ages. From the 1901-1906 Jewish Encyclopedia, now in the public domain. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)  Jews have historically considered themselves “people of the book” ( am hasefer in Hebrew), referring to sacred tomes, but the phrase is turning out to have an equally powerful, if unintended, meaning: scientists are able to read Jewish genomes like a history book. The latest DNA volume weighs in on the controversial, centuries-old (and now revived in a 2008 book ) claim that European Jews are all the descendants of Khazars, a Turkic group of the north Caucasus who converted to Judaism in the late eighth and early ninth century. The DNA has spoken: no.  In the wake of studies in the 1990s that supported biblically based notions of a priestly caste descended from Aaron, brother of Moses, an ambitious new project to analyze genomes collected from Jewish volunteers has yielded its first discoveries. In a paper wit...
Post a Comment
Read more

Moses, Captain Moroni, and the Amalekites

Matthew Roper Insights Volume – 32, Issue – 4 Provo, Utah: Maxwell Institute The views expressed in this article are the views of the author and do not necessarily represent the position of the Maxwell Institute, Brigham Young University, or The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. After Israel’s deliverance from Egyptian bondage and crossing of the Red Sea, another enemy, the Amalekites, attacked the camp on its pilgrimage to worship God at Sinai. 1 Moses, in response to this cowardly act, directed Joshua to fight them. For his part, Moses would stand atop a nearby hill holding the rod of God. “And it came to pass, when Moses held up his hand, that Israel prevailed: and when he let down his hand, Amalek prevailed.” Moses, however, was tired and could not always keep his hands up, so “Aaron and Hur stayed up his hands, the one on the one side, and the other on the other side; and his hands were steady until the going down of the sun” (Exodus 17:8–12, emphasis added), allowin...
Post a Comment
Read more

English Language Help

Copyright Judaica World Archives